SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1599

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHD SADIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
BA1 2498 / 2025



Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures BA1/ 2498/ 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Tajhar Qayyum, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. Mr. K.S. Bora, learned Deputy A.G.

for the State.

3. The applicant–Mohd. Sadik, who is in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime/F.I.R. No. 342 of 2025 registered under Sections 8/20/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act at P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. As per the prosecution case, an F.I.R. was lodged by the informant on 12.10.2025 against one Shavej @ Mohd. Mia alleging that contraband was recovered from his possession.

7. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. and his name surfaced only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co- accused. It is further submitted that the applicant has no previous criminal history and is languishing in jail since his arrest.

8. Learned counsel would further submit that the applicant is a permanent resident of District Saharanpur and,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top