SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1605

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
HARISH CHANDRA SINGH BISHT – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WPSB 495 / 2024



Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSB 495/ 2024 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Central Govt.

Standing Counsel, for the respondents.

(2) Petitioner is serving as Deputy Commandant in Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB). He was transferred to Ranikhet in the year 2019. Vide order dated 18.4.2024, he was transferred to Bomdila in the State of Arunachal Pradesh. Petitioner has approached this Court challenging the said transfer order mainly on the ground of his ill health.

(3) It was contended that petitioner’s left leg sustained fracture in an accident, therefore it is not possible for him to serve in Arunachal Pradesh, which is a hard station.

(4) This Court, vide order dated 7.8.2024, passed interim order providing that petitioner shall not be relieved from the present place of posting till the next date of listing. It is not in dispute that petitioner is still serving in Ranikhet on the strength of the said interim order. Nearly two years have gone by since passing of the interim order. Petitioner has served at Ranikhet for nearly seven years. Normal duration of posting of an officer of SSB at one place is three years.

(5) Transfer is an incidence of service and judicial interference with the order of transfer should be minimal, that too only when there is violation of some statutory provision or there is allegation of malice. Since that is not the case here, therefore, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the writ petition pending.

(6) Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to petitioner to make representation regarding his transfer to Director General. If he makes such representation within one week from today, decision thereupon shall be taken, as per law, within four weeks thereafter. It shall be open for the petitioner to submit his representation through e-mail. Till decision on petitioner’s representation, he shall not be relieved from Ranikhet.

(Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)

12.3.2026 Pr P K R U A M B A O R DH DU26s8De.C TiN a 5r g ti :4ae 7 Atc l: a 3F2N =R 2 l ,30 I u0 y pN C=mK o s, 93 6 i so 1b ga .tA= 0 0e n 3 N 5 H r8l e C=72DId oG Ba 2 ,d b D H0E e y 5C7 C=3aP 1: O9,20 R c56UA na3E B =f08 TO P9D + D R1,FH CsaB tA K9 '=O3 T 6 U5 0UD M TEH9A 17 KA6 R4URB3 K 9MaH 4fK8A 0HR N E2 F D1Nc, D5o08,u 6=H2A IfG C6He aC 1 O A4U B R 56T 81 aOf03F 52eDFb619C8Ad54

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top