SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1628

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KULDEEP SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPSS 3693 / 2018



Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS/ 3693/ 2018 with WPSS/ 3708/ 2018 WPSS/ 3709/ 2018 WPSS/ 3711/ 2018 WPSS/ 3712/ 2018 WPSS/ 3713/ 2018 WPSS/ 3714/ 2018 WPSS/ 3715/ 2018 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Siddhant Manral, Advocate for the petitioners.

2. Mr. Pradeep Hairiya, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/

respondents.

3. Since common questions of law and fact are involved in these petitions, therefore, they are being heard and decided together. However, for the sake of brevity and convenience, facts of WPSS No. 3693 of 2018 alone are being considered and discussed.

4. Mr. Kuldeep Sharma (petitioner in WPSS No. 3693 of 2018) was engaged as Seasonal Collection Amin in 1998. In the year 2016, he filed WPSS No. 1570 of 2016, which was allowed and the competent authority were directed to consider his case for regularisation on the post of Collection Amin from the date his juniors were regularised.

5. Pursuant to the said judgment, regularised, vide order dated 08.01.2018, passed by District Magistrate, Haridwar. Subsequently, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top