HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHD SHAHVEJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
ABA 4 / 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or SL. proceedings or No. Date directions and COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS Registrar’s order with Signatures ABA No. 04 of 2026 Mohd. Shahvej --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Ashish Naithani, J., Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the Applicant.
2. Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. The Applicant-Mohd. Shahvej is before this Court seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Fir/Case Crime No. 593 of 2025, registered at Police Station Kotwali Gangnahar Roorkee, District Haridwar, for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 115(2), 118(1), 333, 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023.
4. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned State Counsel. Perused the record.
5. Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant was granted ad-interim anticipatory bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.01.2026. It is further submitted that the Applicant has duly complied with the directions contained in the said order and has not misused the liberty granted to him. Therefore, it is prayed that the ad-
interim protection granted to the Applicant be made absolute.
6. Learned State Counsel opposed the Anticipatory Bail Application and submits that the investigation is still in progress. 7. Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, particularly the fact that the Applicant has been enjoying the benefit of ad-interim anticipatory bail since 09.01.2026 without misuse of liberty, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served in curtailing the liberty
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.