##PAGE1##

SL. Office Notes,

No. Date reports,

orders or COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

proceedings

or directions

and

Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

WPMS No. 1402 of 2026

Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Ms. Stuti Pandey, learned counsel for the

petitioner.

2. Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for the

respondents.

3. By the instant petition has been preferred

by the petitioner for the following reliefs:-

(i) a suitable writ order or direction quashing the

impugned part of order dated 08.05.2026 (Annexure no.6

page no. 37 to page no. 39) passed by the learned Civil

Judge (Junior Division) Dehradun on the application

numbered 6C2 filed by the Petitioner for interim injunction

in O.S. No. 127 of 2026, “ Smt. Reena Mishra vs. Executive

Officer Nagar Nigam Dehradun and others” whereby the

learned Civil Judge, (J.D) Dehradun has declined to pass ad

interim injunction in favour of the plaintiff/petitioner.

(ii) a suitable writ, order or direction directing the

respondents, their sub ordinate officer, employee, not to

demolish the house of the petitioner and not to take forcible

possession of the property of the petitioner described in the

bottom of the plaint of suit nor become cause of the same

till final decision on ad-interim injunction application on

merit passed by the Learned Trial Court.”

4. Admittedly, there is no dispute that the

petitioner is the plaintiff in civil suit wherein

6C2 application has been moved.

5. In such view of the matter, since there is

an apprehension of a demolition of the structure

which the petitioner has raised pursuant to the

impugned notice, this Court is of the view that

let 6C2 application moved by the petitioner in

the pending suit be expedited and till then the

demolition pursuant to the impugned notice

may not take place.

6. Mr. Ashish Joshi, also fairly suggest that

let the civil court be directed to decide the 6C2

application as early as possible after giving

opportunity to the Municipal Corporation also

and till then they will not proceed with the

demolition.

7. In such view of the matter, particularly

on submissions as advanced by Mr. Ashish Joshi

the instant writ petition is disposed of finally

with the direction to the concerned civil court to

decide pending 6C2 application as early as

possible preferably within three weeks from

today and till the disposal of 6C2 application the

demolition pursuant to the impugned notice

shall not take place.

8. The petitioner shall supply copy of the

plaint to the office of the Municipal

Corporation by tomorrow positively.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)

21.05.2026

Nahid