HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
JAVED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.
Date or directions No and Registrar’s order with Signatures 2026:UHC:4009 BA1 No. 594 of 2026 Sameer alis Chikna ....Applicant Vs.
State of Uttarakhand ......Respondent Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the Applicant.
2. Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. The present Bail Application has been moved by the Applicant—Javed, S/o Tahir Ahmad, R/o Shakti Mohalla, Roorkee, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR/Case Crime No. 99 of 2026, registered at Police Station Kotwali Gangnahar, District Haridwar, for offences punishable under Sections 25(1-A) and 25(1-B)(A) of the Arms Act.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
5. Learned counsel for the Applicant, while pressing the bail application, submitted that the Applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and is in judicial custody since 16.03.2026. It is contended that the Applicant has not committed the alleged offence and was neither present at the spot nor was any incriminating article recovered from his posse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.