HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VISHAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes, reports, orders SL. Dat or proceedings COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No. e an o d r d R i e re g c is t t io ra n r s ’ s order with Signatures IA No.1/2026 (Short Term Bail Application)
In BA 1st No.818 of 2026 Vishal ……Applicant Vs.
State of Uttarakhand …Respondent Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the Applicant.
2. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, Mr. Devendra Singh, learned AGAs, for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. In the High Court of Uttarakhand, the present case arises from Bail Application filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking regular bail for the Applicant – Vishal, who has been accused in FIR/Case Crime No.21 of 2026, dated 10.01.2026, under Sections 103 (1) and 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Kotwali Haridwar, District Haridwar.
4. Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has filed the present short term bail application on the ground that Applicant is pursuing BA. L.L.B, course from South Point Law College, Village Joshi Chauhan, District Sonipat, District Haryana, and the Applicant has successfully passed 7th Semesters, and at present studying in 8th Semester
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.