SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1760

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
REENA MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
EXECUTIVE OFFICER NAGAR NIGAM DEHRADUN – Respondent


SL. Office Notes, No. Date reports, orders or COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMS No. 1402 of 2026 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Ms. Stuti Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for the respondents.

3. By the instant petition has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs:-

(i) a suitable writ order or direction quashing the impugned part of order dated 08.05.2026 (Annexure no.6 page no. 37 to page no. 39) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Dehradun on the application numbered 6C2 filed by the Petitioner for interim injunction in O.S. No. 127 of 2026, “ Smt. Reena Mishra vs. Executive Officer Nagar Nigam Dehradun and others” whereby the learned Civil Judge, (J.D) Dehradun has declined to pass ad interim injunction in favour of the plaintiff/petitioner.

(ii) a suitable writ, order or direction directing the respondents, their sub ordinate officer, employee, not to demolish the house of the petitioner and not to take forcible possession of the property of the petitioner described in the bottom of the plaint of suit nor become cause of the same till final

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top