2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1762
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
HEC COLLEGE OF NURSING – Appellant
Versus
HEMWATI NANDAN BAHUGUNA UTTARAKHAND MEDICAL EDUCATION UNIVERSITY – Respondent
WPMS 1445 / 2026
##PAGE1##
2026:UHC:4003
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
Writ Petition Service Single No. 144 of 2024
21 May, 2026
Dr. Mahendra Pal Singh Grewal --Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others --Respondents
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
There is no representation for the petitioner.
Mr. K.N. Joshi, Deputy Advocate General for the State of
Uttarakhand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT
Petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher
in A.N. Jha, Government Inter College, Rudrapur in the
year 1986 for teaching Punjabi language, however, he
thereafter accepted appointment as Professor (Hindi) in
Sri Gurunanak Khalsa Degree College, Ganganagar
(Rajasthan) w.e.f. 18.11.1988, without resigning from
the post of Assistant Teacher in A.N. Jha, Government
Inter College, Rudrapur.
2. According to petitioner, he served as
Professor at Ganganagar till 27.11.1995 and thereafter
he re-joined duties in A.N. Jha, Government Inter
College, Rudrapur on 07.03.1996. Petitioner retired
from service after attaining age of superannuation on
31.03.2006.
3. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has
sought the following reliefs:
1
##PAGE2##2026:UHC:4003
“(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in nature of
mandamus directing the respondents to grant the
pension to the petitioner for his complete service,
along with 12% interest, for the delayed payment,
from the date of his superannuation till the date of
actual payment for the delayed payment.
(ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
mandamus directing the respondents to give the
retiral benefits to the petitioner for his complete
service, along with 12% interest, for the delayed
payment, from the date of his superannuation till the
date of actual payment for the delayed payment.”
4. A counter affidavit is filed by Mr. Daya
Shaknakar Pandey on behalf of respondent nos. 2 & 3.
Para no. 3 of the said counter affidavit is reproduced
below:-
“3. That the petitioner was appointed in the
office of District Inspector of School Nainital vide
order no. 9 dated 2.8.1986 in CT cadre as Assistant
Teacher (Punjabi). The petitioner has joined in
Government Inter College, Rudrapur, Nainital on
7.8.1986. The petitioner after his first appointment
on 7.8.1986 to 28.8.1988 has posted as Assistant
Teacher in Government Inter College, Rudrapur,
Nainital. The petitioner after his total services from
5.1.1988 to 30.4.1988 (total 1 month 7 days) was on
leave without pay and from 8.7.1988 to 4.8.1988
(total 28 days) was on medical leave.
During appointment as Assistant Teacher, the
petitioner without taking permission from
department, the petitioner has worked as Lecturer
(Hindi) in Government Inter College Gadarpur from
5.1.1988 to 30.4.1988 on part time basis. It is
further submitted that form 18.11.1988 to
27.11.1995 the petitioner has worked in Shri Guru
Nanak Khalsa Degree College Ganganagar,
Rajasthan. In this regard the petitioner has never
applied for no objection certificate. The petitioner
from 28.8.1988 to 6.3.1996 was absent from
Government Inter College Rudrapur Nainital without
any permission and information to department. As
per office record of the school, the warning letter was
issued to petitioner on 29.7.1992 despite that the
petitioner has not joined in Government Inter College
Rudrapur Nainital.
On 8.3.1996 the Additional Education Director,
Kumaun Division, Nainital due to mistake has given
2
##PAGE3##2026:UHC:4003
promotion to petitioner on Assistant Teacher LT
Grade, but due to long absent from department
finally the promotion of the petitioner was cancelled.
The District Inspector of School Nainital vide letter
no. 2/93 dated 15.4.1996 on the ground that the
petitioner is absent till 10.8.1992 as well as absent
from 28.8.1988 to 6.3.1996 there was not provision
to sanction leave for 8 years. The services of the
petitioner were terminated.
Against termination order dated 15.4.1996 the
petitioner has filed a petition no. 416/19