SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1770

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD ROORKEE THROUGH ITS EXUEWCUTIVE OFFICER – Appellant
Versus
SMT. KANTA SACHDEVA – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Second Appeal No.124 of 2011 Nagar Palika Parishad Roorkee through its Executive Officer and another ….....Defendants/Appellants Versus Smt. Kanta Sachdeva and Another ..Plaintiffs/Respondents Present:-

Mr. Lalit Miglani, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate for respondent no.1.

Mr. I.P. Kohli, Advocate for respondent no.2.

Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.(Oral)

This Second Appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 26.11.2011 passed by the Additional District Judge, Roorkee, District Haridwar, in Civil Appeal No. 20 of 2008, Smt. Kanta Sachdeva vs. Nagar Palika Parishad, Roorkee and Another, whereby the said appeal has been allowed and the judgment and decree dated 29.08.2008 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Roorkee, District Haridwar, in Original Suit No. 51 of 2003 has been set-aside and thereby the appellate court has decreed the suit for permanent injunction.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff/respondent No. 1 herein instituted a suit for permanent injunction against defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Roorkee, with the pleadings that the plaintiff had

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top