HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DR BIRENDRA DEO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPSB 287 / 2026
##PAGE1##
2026:UHC:3964-DB
I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL
THE HON’BLE CHI EF JUSTI CE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE JUSTI CE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY
Writ Petition (S/B) No.287 of 2026
May 21, 2026
Dr. Birendra Deo Singh ----Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Others ----Respondents
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. Anup Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner
Mr. J.C. Pande, learned Standing Counsel and Mr. Sachin Mohan Singh, learned
Brief Holder for the State/respondent no.1
Mr. C.S. Rawat and Ms. Rajni Supyal, learned counsel respondent nos.2 to
6/University
JUDGMENT : (per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta C. J.
1. The petitioner, feeling aggrieved by Office Order
dated 07.05.2026, whereby it has been intimated that the
petitioner would retire on 31.05.2026, has filed the
present writ petition.
2. The initial appointment of the petitioner, vide
order dated 11.07.1999, was as a Subject Matter
Specialist (Agronomy). In due course of time, he was
granted various promotions and presently he is holding
the designation of Professor and is posted in the
Directorate of Extension Education.
1
##PAGE2##2026:UHC:3964-DB
3. The case of the petitioner is that, by order dated
20.04.2015, age of superannuation of the teaching staff in
the University was increased from 60 to 65 years. The
further case of the petitioner is that he has all through
been treated as a teaching staff and promotion on the
post of Professor was granted to him because he was
treated as member of a teaching staff. However, by
impugned order dated 04.07.2023 passed by the State
Government, it has been held that the employees other
than teachers, would retire at the age of 60 years.
4. The submission of learned counsel for the
petitioner is that, in identical facts and circumstances, in
case of Dr. Vinod Kumar, who was initially appointed as
Senior Statistician/Senior Research Officer, Statistics
(General Budge), the University sought to retire him at
the age of 60 years treating him to be member of non-
teaching staff. It was subjected to challenge by him by
way of Writ Petition (S/B) No.350/2023 and the said writ
petition was allowed by a Coordinate Bench by judgment
dated 14.03.2024. The State Government has already
complied with the said judgment and has permitted Dr.
Vinod Kumar to continue in service treating his age of
superannuation as 65 years. It is submitted that following
2
##PAGE3##2026:UHC:3964-DB
the said judgment, another writ petition bearing no. WPSB
No.275/2024 “Ramji Maurya vs. State of Uttarakhand &
Others”, filed by Ramji Maurya, who was also initially
appointed as Subject Matter Specialist (Agronomy) in the
Directorate of Extension Education, was disposed of by
another Coordinate Bench vide order dated 10.12.2025, in
terms of order and judgment in the case of Dr. Vinod
Kumar and in the said case also the order of this Court
has been complied with.
5. Shri C.S. Rawat, learned counsel appearing for
the University does not dispute the above factual position.
He admits that the petitioners of the aforesaid cases have
been permitted to continue in service treating their age of
superannuation as 65 years. He further admits that the
University has not challenged the aforesaid orders.
6. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the
State, on the other hand, submits that the State
Government has challenged the judgment of Coordinate
Bench in the case of Dr. Vinod Kumar (supra) before the
Hon’ble Supreme Court and the SLP is pending. He,
however, does not dispute that there is no interim order in
the said case and the order of the Coordinate Bench in the
3
##PAGE4##2026:UHC:3964-DB
case of Dr. Vinod Kumar (supra) as well as in the case of
Ramji Maurya (supra) have been duly complied with.
7. In view of the aforesaid undisputed factual
position, we dispose of the present writ petition also in
terms of the judgment and order dated 14.03.2024
passed in WPSB No.350/2023 “Dr. Vinod Kumar vs.
Secretary, Department of Agriculture and Farmers
Welfare, Government of Uttarak
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.