SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1775

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MANOJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or SL. proceedings or No. Date directions and COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS/1148/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Abhijay Negi, Advocate for the petitioners.

2. Mr. K.N. Joshi, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Ms. Menka Tripathi, Advocate for respondent no. 2, through video conferencing.

4. Petitioners belong to different reserved categories, namely Scheduled Caste, Other Backward Classes and Persons with Disabilities. They are questioning the advertisement issued by Uttarakhand Public Service Commission on 30.12.2025 for the post of Lecturer.

5. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have sought the following reliefs:-

I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the advertisement bearing number A-3/S-1/DR (L.I.C.)/2025 dated 30.12.2025 (Annexure No. 03; Page No. 38 to 81) as being contrary to the Government Policy on post based roster determination in letter number 124/XXX(2)/2020-53(01)/2001 dated 22.05.2020 (Annexure No. 02; Page 29 to 37);

II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No. 02 to re-determine the pos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top