SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1788

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SABRI NAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPCRL 938 / 2026



##PAGE1##

2026:UHC:4020

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

WPCRL No. 938 of 2026

Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for

the petitioners and Mrs. Rangoli Purohit,

learned Brief Holder for the State.

2. Mr. Petitioners Smt. Sabri Naj D/o

Mohd. Gulamja and Muntazir Ali S/o Naseem

Ali both resident of District Haridwar

approached to this Court by way of this

petition seeking adequate protection from

the respondent nos. 3 to 6, who are family

members of the petitioner no.1.

3. It is submitted that both of them were

in love and married on 14.05.2026 at Piran

Kaliyar and their marriage is also registered

before the Sub Registrar, Registration of

Marriage on 15.05.2026, copy of which is

enclosed in page 17 and with regard to the

age, high school marksheet and the aadhar

card have been enclosed.

4. Both are present before this court in-

person and are identified by their counsel.

5. Learned Brief Holder for the State has

not disputed their age and marriage.

6. In such view of the matter, since both

are major and now married with each other

and their marriage is also registered,

therefore, the local administration is under

the legal obligation to assess the threat

##PAGE2##

2026:UHC:4020

perception, if any, and take appropriate

steps.

7. Accordingly, the writ petition is

disposed of finally with the direction to the

SSP Haridwar to assess the threat

perception, if any, to the petitioners from

the respondent nos. 3 to 6 and if he comes

to the conclusion that there is any threat,

take appropriate steps. In addition to this,

the SHO concerned is also directed to call

upon the respondent nos. 3 to 6 and advice

them not to take law in their hands.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)

21.05.2026

Shiv/

##PAGE3##

2026:UHC:4020

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top