SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1789

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
PUNEET AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI RAKESH THAPLIYAL

21st May 2026 Criminal Writ Petition No. 1431 of 2025 Puneet Agarawal .…….Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ….…Respondents.

with Criminal Writ Petition No. 762 of 2026 Puneet Agarawal .…….Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ….…Respondents.

Mr. Narayan Har Gupta, Mr. Lalit Sharma and Ms. Anmol Sandhu and Mr.

Niranjan Bhatt, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned Govt. Advocate with Mr. Tumul Nainwal learned AGA for the State.

Mr. Karan Anand, learned Counsel for private respondents.

Mr. Rajendra Dobhal Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, Advocate and Mr. Mr. Vikash Bahuguna, learned counsel for the applicants in Intervention Applications.

Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

On 20.05.2026, the Secretary of the MDDA and DFO, Mussoorie joined proceeding through V.C. and apprised about the number of trees on which the S.H.O. concerned was directed to visit site and submit a report. He apprised that there are twenty-two fruit bearing trees, though the Secretary to the Development Authority apprised that there were only eight trees out of which two trees have b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top