SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1797

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Subhash Upadhyay, J
THAKUR RAMCHANDARA JI MAHARAJ – Appellant
Versus
SUNITA RANI – Respondent
CLR No.19 of 2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mohd. Shafy
For the Respondents: Rishab Ranghar

A civil revision may be disposed of in terms of a compromise agreement reached between the parties, provided the terms are settled amicably and the court modifies the lower court's order to reflect the agreement.

Headnote:The matter pertains to a civil revision arising from a tenancy dispute involving SCC Suit No. 2 of 2018. The parties entered into a compromise agreement wherein the tenant agreed to surrender the tenancy and vacate the premises by 09.06.2026, while the landlord agreed to relinquish all claims to rent, damages, and mesne profits. The court noted the amicable settlement and the respondent's commitment to hand over peaceful possession. The primary issue was whether the revision could be disposed of based on the compromise application filed by the parties. The court reasoned that since the parties had settled their disputes amicably and the terms of the surrender of tenancy were clearly defined, the revision should be resolved in accordance with the settlement. the instant Civil Revision No.19 of 2020 is disposed of in terms of the compromise.

Table of Content
1. condonation of delay in filing a civil revision when there is no objection from the respondent. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. disposal of civil revision based on a compromise agreement for surrender of tenancy and vacation of premises. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

Registrar’s order with Signatures

2. As per the office report, there is a delay of two months and twenty eight days’ in filing the present civil revision. Learned counsel for the revisionist prays for condonation of delay in filing the revision.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent has not objected to the said prayer.

4. The delay in filing the present civil revision is condoned.

5. Learned counsel for the parties have filed a Compromise Application (IA No.11184 of 2026), wherein it is stated that the parties have gone into compromise and have settled their disputes amicably. The parties were present before this Court in-person and have submitted that the compromise application has been filed, wherein the respondent has admitted that she will vacate the tenanted premises till 09.06.2026 and will hand over the peaceful possession of the premises, which is a subject matter of the SCC Suit No.2 of 2018.

6. The contentions in the Compromise Application (IA No.11184 of 2026) are as follows:-

“That the respondent has agreed to surrender her tenancy in favour of the revisionist and she is also agree that she will vacate the tenanted premises till 09.06.2026 and she will hand over the peaceful possession of the premises which is the subject matter of SCC Suit no. 2 of 2018 decided by Judge Small Causes 2nd Additional District Judge Kashipur, to Shri Gaurav Agarwal S/o Late Gopal Das, who is at present Chairman of "Thakur Ramchandra Ji Maharaj and Shiv Ji Maharaj vaa Shivji Maharaj Virajman Noon Walo ki Dharamshala", Mohalla Ganj. Main Bazar kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, till 9/6/2026,

3. The revisionist has agreed to relinquish entire rent, or damages in favour of the respondent. Meaning there by the respondent will not pay any rent, damages, mesne profit and cost of the suit to the revisionist. The respondent vacates the premises till 09.06.2026.

4. That in case the respondent does not vacate the tenanted premises till 9th of June 2026 the revisionist shall be entitled to get evicted the respondent with the help of the police and the suit bearing SCC Suit no. 2 of 2018 decided by Judge Small Causes 2nd Additional District Judge Kashipur will be deemed to have been decreed in favour of the revisionist and the revisionist shall be entitled to recover the entire amount as sought in the suit from the respondent. The respondent shall be liable to be evicted and shall also be liable to pay the entire decreetal amount sought in the suit.”

7. In view of the above, the instant Civil Revision No.19 of 2020 is disposed of in terms of the compromise. The order of the trial court is modified accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top