Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Manoj Kumar Gupta, CJ, Subhash Upadhyay, J
Shivani Saini – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute regarding mid-stream alteration of service recruitment selection criteria and cut-off marks. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. analysis of statutory regulations and the nature of the fourth amendment 2024 as a beneficial measure. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. recruitment advertisement explicitly incorporated the existing statutory minimum qualifying mark framework. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. absence of prejudice due to lower cut-offs and provisional verification lists do not vest selection rights. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta)
1. The present intra-court appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.11.2025, passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (S/S) No.1692 of 2024, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellants was dismissed, as also the order dated 17.06.2026, whereby Miscellaneous Application (MCC No.03 of 2025), filed by the appellants seeking recall of the order dated 19.11.2025, has also been dismissed.
2. The dispute arose out of the recruitment exercise undertaken by the Uttarakhand Public Servi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
