HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Ashish Naithani, J
VISHAL KOUSHAL ALIAS SAHIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Short Term Bail Appl. No.01 of 2026 | BA1 No.753 of 2026
##PAGE1##
Office Notes,
reports, orders
21.
or proceedings COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA]
Date or directions
SL.
and Registrar’s
No.
order with
Signatures
(Short Term Bail Appl. No.01 of 2026)
In
BA1 No.753 of 2026
Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Pradeep Sharma, learned counsel for the
Applicant appearing through V.C.
2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate
General assisted by Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief
Holder for the State.
3. Present short term/interim bail application is
filed by the applicant seeking his release for 20 days
in FIR/Case Crime No.157 of 2025 for the offences
punishable under Sections 64(1), 351(3), 70(2) of
BNS 2023 and 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station
Sitarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar.
4. Heard on short term bail application.
5. In the FIR lodged on 31.05.2025 the
complainant stated that his 17 year old daughter was
taken by the applicant/accused to his House at Ward
No.2, Sitarganj where he locked her in a room; beat
her and forcibly raped her until about 06:00 p.m.
and threatened her to make her videos viral and kill
the family.
6. Learned counsel for the applicant submits
that short term bail is being sought on the extreme
urgent humanitarian ground as the father of the
applicant is suffering from serious and life
threatening cardiac ailments, which requires
immediate care. Learned counsel for the applicant
submits that father of the applicant is aged and is
unable to properly manage his treatment and day-to-
day affairs thus the applicant being the son is
urgently required to take care of his father.
7. On the previous occasion the learned State
counsel was asked to get instruction as to whether
there is any other person available in the family to
take care of the father of the applicant.
##PAGE2##8. Today, learned State counsel has placed the
instruction before this Court. As per the
instructions, learned State counsel submits that at
present applicant’s wife and his small son is there in
the family. He submits that at present the wife of the
applicant is taking care of the father of the
applicant. Learned State counsel further submits
that applicant has committed a heinous crime and he
should not be released on short term bail.
9. After hearing learned counsel for the parties
and considering the overall facts and circumstances
of the case, it appears that applicant is trying to
search the grounds for his release on short term bail
while his wife is there in the family to take care of
his father (applicant’s father).
10. Considering the same at this juncture, the
grounds are not found sufficient for first short term
bail at present At this juncture, this Court is not of
the opinion to release the applicant on short term
bail. Accordingly short term bail is rejected.
11. List this bail application on 11.06.2026.
(Ashish Naithani, J.)
25.05.2026
Arti
##PAGE3##
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.