SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1860

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ASHISH DHYANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE MANOJ KUMAR TI WARI Writ Petition No. 1733 of 2020 (SS)

Parmeshwari Prasad -- Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others -- Respondents With Writ Petition No. 1723 of 2020 (SS)

Ashish Dhyani -- Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others -- Respondents With Writ Petition No. 1724 of 2020 (SS)

Shailesh Singh Bisht -- Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others -- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Advocates: Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ramesh Joshi, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand ----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT

1. Since common questions of law and fact are involved in these petitions, therefore they are heard together and are being decided by a common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity, facts of Writ Petition No. 1733 of 2020 (SS), Parmeshwari Prasad Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others alone are being discussed and considered.

2. Petitioner was engaged as PTA Teacher in a Government aided Institution w.e.f. 12.01.2015 and he was paid honorarium @ Rs. 1,000/- per month by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top