SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1883

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ASHISH KASHYAP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Bail Application (IA No.1 of 2025)

In Criminal Jail Appeal No.78 of 2022 Ashish Kashyap …… Appellant Vs.

State of Uttarakhand ……Respondent Presence:

Mr. Vikas Anand, learned counsel for the appellant.

Mr. V.S. Rawat, learned AGA for the State.

Mr. Sudhir Kumar, learned counsel for the informant.

Coram: Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.

Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

The instant appeal has been preferred against judgment and order dated 29.07.2022, passed in Sessions Trial No.11 of 2019, State Vs. Ashish Kashyap, by the court of 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Haldwani, District Nainital. By it, the appellant has been convicted under Sections 302, 394, 411 of IPC and sentenced accordingly. The appellant seeks bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. According to the prosecution, when PW1, Umesh Kumar, returned to his house on 09.09.2018, he found his brother lying on the bed with a rope tied around his neck. He took his brother, the deceased Manoj Kumar Kashyap, to the hospital, where he was declared brought dead.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the case is based on circumstant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top