Rakesh Thapliyal
ROHIT PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPCRL No. 949 of 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings
| SL. No. | Date or directions | COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS | Registrar’s order with Signatures |
1. Mr. D.S. Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned AGA for the State.
3. By the instant petition, the petitioner is praying for the following relief:
“i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 01.01.2026 passed by learned District Magistrate, Nainital in Case No. 06 of 2026 (State Vs. Rohit Pandey) under Section 3 / 4 of the Goonda Control Act.
ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 08.04.2026 passed by learned District Magistrate, Nainital in Case No. 93 of 2024 (State Vs. Rohit Pandey) under Section 3 / 4 of the Goonda Control Act.”
4. It appears from the relief that petitioner is challenging two notices issued under Section 3 / 4 of the Goonda Control Act, i.e. notice dated 08.04.2024 registered as Case No. 93 of 2024 and another notice dated 01.01.2026, registered as Case No. 06 of 2026.
5. In the notice dated 01.01.2026, there are reference of 9 cases, out of which, 7 cases were already mentioned in earlier notice dated 08.04.2024.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already given his response to the earlier notice dated 08.04.2024 but uptil date no decision has been taken by the District Magistrate and in the second notice, two more cases have been added and one such case is Case Crime No. 10 of 2025, which has already been compounded.
7. On the other side, Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned AGA submits that impugned notices are issued under Section 3 / 4 of the Goonda Control Act and petitioner should give response to it, so that District Magistrate may take decision on it and these notice will not prejudice to the petitioner. He further submits that earlier notice dated 08.04.2024 is now merged in the new notice dated 01.01.2026, as in the new notice, all the seven cases mentioned earlier in notice dated 08.04.2024 have also been inclosed, therefore, petitioner should give his response to latest notice dated 01.01.2026 only.
8. I found force on the submission as advanced by Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned AGA for the State.
9. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file his response within 15 days to the notice dated 01.01.2026 and then the District Magistrate shall take decision on his response within fifteen days thereafter.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.