SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1016054

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KRISHNA JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 1623 of 2024 Krishna Joshi ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:-

Mr. Pawan Kumar Joshi, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, AGA with Mr. Himanshu Sain, Brief Holder for the State.

Bail Application No. 2049 of 2024 Abhishek Rawat ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:-

Mr. Pawan Kumar Joshi, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, AGA with Mr. Himanshu Sain, Brief Holder for the State.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Since both these bail applications arise from one and the same FIR, they are heard together and being decided by this common order.

2. Applicants Krishna Joshi and Abhishek Rawat are in judicial custody in Case Crime/FIR No. 111 of 2023, under Sections 302, 201, 397, 411 IPC and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar. They have sought their release on bail. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. The deceased left his house on 10.06.2023 at about 06:00 in the morning so as to run e-rickshaw. He did not return. On 11.06.2023, his dead body was recovere

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top