IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 947 of 2023 Smt. Prerna ....Revisionist Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and Another ..... Respondents Present:-

Mr. Surendra Kumar Bahl, Advocate for the revisionist.

Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

The challenge in this revision is made to the order dated 22.11.2023, passed in Case No.201 of 2022, Smt. Prerna Vs. Ravish Kumar, by the court of Additional Family Judge, Roorkee, District Haridwar (“the case”). By it, the respondent no.2 has been directed to pay Rs. 6,000/-, as interim maintenance, to the revisionist.

2. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and perused the record.

3. Notices were served on the respondent no.2, but none is present for the respondent no.2.

4. The case is based on an application filed under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“the Code”) by the revisionist seeking maintenance for herself from the respondent no.2. In the case, an application for interim maintenance was filed, which has been allowed by the impugned order.

5. Learned counsel for the revisionist would submit that the inadequate interim maintenance has been awarded. It