SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1016140

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KALAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 866 of 2024

08 April, 2025 Kalam Singh --Revisionist Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Amit Kapri, Advocate for the revisionist.

Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General along with Mr.

Devender Singh, learned Advocate for the State.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.

This criminal revision is preferred for quashing and setting aside the judgment and order dated 26.09.2024 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Pithoragarh in Criminal Appeal No.30/2018 “Kalam Singh and Another Vs. State of Uttarakhand” whereby the learned Appellate Court dismissed the appeal affirming the order dated 06.09.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Chief Magistrate, Pithoragarh, District Pithoragarh in H2 Range Case No.06/2017, Forest Ven Range, Dharchula, District Pithoragarh, Criminal Case No.841 of 2018, “State of Uttarakhand Vs. Kalam Singh and Another” convicting the revisionist U/s 51 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of ₹10,000/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top