SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1016210

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
PRATIBHA RAWAT – Appellant
Versus
PHARMACY COUNCIL STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Misc. Single No.328 of 2024

12th February, 2026 Pratibha Rawat ……...Petitioner Versus Pharmacy Council State of Uttarakhand and others ……….Respondents With Writ Petition Misc. Single No.329 of 2024 Suman ……...Petitioner Versus Pharmacy Council State of Uttarakhand and others ……….Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Sandeep Kothari and Ms. Ruchika Negi, Advocates for the petitioner.

Ms. Seema Sah, Advocate for respondent no.1.

Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, Advocate for respondent no.3.

Mr. N.S. Pundir, Advocate for respondent no.4.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, these petitions are clubbed together and decided by this common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity and convenience, facts of WPMS No.328 of 2024 alone are being considered and discussed.

2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner has sought a direction to respondent no.1 to register the petitioner, as Pharmaci

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top