HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
PRATIBHA RAWAT – Appellant
Versus
PHARMACY COUNCIL STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Misc. Single No.328 of 2024
12th February, 2026 Pratibha Rawat ……...Petitioner Versus Pharmacy Council State of Uttarakhand and others ……….Respondents With Writ Petition Misc. Single No.329 of 2024 Suman ……...Petitioner Versus Pharmacy Council State of Uttarakhand and others ……….Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. Sandeep Kothari and Ms. Ruchika Negi, Advocates for the petitioner.
Ms. Seema Sah, Advocate for respondent no.1.
Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, Advocate for respondent no.3.
Mr. N.S. Pundir, Advocate for respondent no.4.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, these petitions are clubbed together and decided by this common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity and convenience, facts of WPMS No.328 of 2024 alone are being considered and discussed.
2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner has sought a direction to respondent no.1 to register the petitioner, as Pharmaci
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.