SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1016233

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
UTTARAKHAND COOPERATIVE ELECTION TRIBUNAL – Appellant
Versus
MANGE RAM SIROHI – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHISH NAITHANI

27TH FEBRUARY, 2025 SPECI AL APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2025 Uttarakhand Cooperative Election Tribunal. …Appellant Versus Mange Ram Sirohi & another …Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel. Counsel for the respondent no. 1: Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel.

Counsel for respondent no. 2: Mr. S.N. Babulkar, learned Advocate General with Mr. C.S. Rawat, learned Chief Standing Counsel and Mr. Ganesh Dutt Kandpal, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand.

JUDGMENT :

(per Sri Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)

Uttarakhand Cooperative Election Tribunal has challenged the interim order dated 21.02.2025, passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition(M/S) No. 3273 of 2024. Relevant extract of the said order is reproduced below:-

“11. When the changed Rules were notified on 12.12.2024, the petitioner has filed an amendment application seeking mandamus declaring the proviso to Rule 12(b) of 2018 Rules as illegal, irregular and unconstitutional amounting to interference in the election process, once the same has already been commenc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top