SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1016386

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SALEKHCHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPMS 1820 / 2021



IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (MS) No. 1820 of 2021 Salekhchand and Another ...Petitioners Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and Others ...Respondents Presence:

1. None appears for the petitioners.

2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. Mr. Sachin Panwar, learned counsel for respondent no. 6.

Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. (Oral)

1. The instant matter was listed yesterday i.e. on 03.03.2025; however, the learned counsel for the petitioner was not present, consequently, in the interest of justice the matter is posted for today.

2. Today, again the learned counsel for the petitioner is also not present.

3. The instant petition has been preferred by the petitioner with the following reliefs:

“(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 16.01.2021 passed by the respondent no. 3 in column 8, serial no. 41, of the land of the petitioners Khasra No. 211 area 0.287 hectare land situated village Sethpur, Tehsil Laksar District Haridwar. (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned registered lease deed dated 19.04.2021 executed in the name of respondent no. 6 of the land of the petitioners Khasra No. 211 area 0.287 hectare land situated village Sethpur, Tehsil Laksar, District Haridwar.

(c) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 and 5 to decide the representation dated 05.07.2021 of the petitioner according to law.

(d) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 to 5 not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the land of the petitioners Khasra No. 211 area 0.287 hectare land situated village Sethpur, Tehsil Laksar, District Haridwar.

(e) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos. 1 to 5 not to change the nature and revenue record of the land of the petitioners Khasra No. 211 area 0.287 hectare land situated village Sethpur, Tehsil Laksar District Haridwar.”

4. As it appears from the relief clause, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 16.01.2021 passed by respondent no. 3, whereby, the land falling in Khasra No. 211 measuring 0.287 hectare land situated at Village Sethpur, Tehsil Laksar, District Haridwar was allotted to respondent no. 6. In addition to this, the petitioner is also challenging the registered lease deed dated 19.04.2021 executed in the name of respondent no. 6. In addition to this, the petitioner is also praying for that the official respondent i.e respondent nos. 1 to 5 may be directed not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the land of the petitioners.

5. The main contention of the petitioner as stated in the petition is that the Asami Patta was allotted to the father of the petitioner in the year1975 since he belongs to a schedule caste community. In 1988 the father of the petitioner died and thereafter the name of the petitioners were recorded in the revenue record on 24.10.1988. It is further contended that the petitioners’ father was in possession over the land since 1975 till his death and thereafter the petitioner is in possession over the land, wherein, he is cultivating “Bajra crops”. It is further contended that when the said land was allotted to the petitioners’ father it was barren land and thereafter by expending huge money the land was used for agricultural purposes. It is further contended that without giving notice to the petitioner the order impugned was passed on 16.01.2021 by which the land of the petitioners was allotted to respondent no. 6 on lease for fishery purposes for 29 years. Thereafter, pursuant to the order dated 16.01.2021 passed by the Sub Collector, Laksar, District Haridwar, the Tehsildar, Laksar issued instructions to the Deputy Registrar, Laksar to proceed with the registration of the lease and subsequent thereto on19.04.2021 the lease deed was registered in the name of respondent no. 6.

6. It is con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top