SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1016392

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
PREM SHANKAR SAXENA – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Service Bench No.432 of 2014

04 March, 2025 Union of India and others ……….Petitioners Versus Prem Shankar Saxena ………Respondent ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Virendra Kaparuwan, learned counsel for the Union of India/Petitioners.

Mr. M. C. Pant, learned counsel for the respondent.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon’ble Justice Shri Manoj Kumar Tiwari Hon’ble Justice Shri Vivek Bharti Sharma

JUDGMENT

(per Shri Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)

This writ petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 14.07.2014 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench in Original Application No.536 of 2011. By the said judgment, punishment of compulsory retirement imposed upon respondent by the Disciplinary Authority; as affirmed by the Appellate Authority, was set aside and it was held that respondent shall be deemed to be in service till the date of his superannuation i.e. 31.07.2009 and he shall be entitled to all consequential benefits.

2. It is not in dispute that respondent was serving as a Wireman in Central Public Works Department; a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top