HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
TEJ RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
23rd JULY, 2025 WRI T PETI TI ON NO. 34 of 2021 (S/ S)
Tej Ram and Others …Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others …Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Anthwal, Advocate Nos.1 & 4 (through video conferencing).
Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate No.2 (through video conferencing).
Counsel for the Respondents : Mr. G.S. Negi, Addl. C.S.C.
Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.
This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers :-
“(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay prevailing the minimum of pay scale as per recommendation of 7th pay commission alongwith arrears as per recommendation of 6th and 7th pay commission with dearness allowances alongwith all consequential benefits to the petitioners as being paid to the regular appointed employees working in the department alongwith rate of interest.
(II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 & 3 to decide the representations of the petitioners.
(III) Issue any other or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.