SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1016393

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
TEJ RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

23rd JULY, 2025 WRI T PETI TI ON NO. 34 of 2021 (S/ S)

Tej Ram and Others …Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others …Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Anthwal, Advocate Nos.1 & 4 (through video conferencing).

Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate No.2 (through video conferencing).

Counsel for the Respondents : Mr. G.S. Negi, Addl. C.S.C.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers :-

“(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay prevailing the minimum of pay scale as per recommendation of 7th pay commission alongwith arrears as per recommendation of 6th and 7th pay commission with dearness allowances alongwith all consequential benefits to the petitioners as being paid to the regular appointed employees working in the department alongwith rate of interest.

(II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 & 3 to decide the representations of the petitioners.

(III) Issue any other or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top