HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NIZAMUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
04TH MARCH, 2025 ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 18 of 2024 Nizamuddin and Another …Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand …Respondent Counsel for the Applicants : Mr. Mani Kumar, Advocate Counsel for the State : Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, A.G.A.
Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.
The present Application has been filed by the applicants seeking Anticipatory Bail under Sections 307, 323 and Section 504 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in Case Crime No.2 of 2024, registered at Police Station Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar.
2. As per the First Information Report dated 02.01.2024, on 31.12.2023, the applicants along with co-accused abused and assaulted the informant and other family members and the applicant no.2 fired on the informant.
3. Heard Mr. Mani Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned A.G.A.
for the State.
4. Mr. Mani Kumar, Advocate has contended that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present matter. There is only one contusion on the informant-Balraj Singh. He has further submitted that the applicants were granted interim bail vide order dated 0
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.