SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1016426

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NIZAMUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

04TH MARCH, 2025 ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 18 of 2024 Nizamuddin and Another …Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand …Respondent Counsel for the Applicants : Mr. Mani Kumar, Advocate Counsel for the State : Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, A.G.A.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The present Application has been filed by the applicants seeking Anticipatory Bail under Sections 307, 323 and Section 504 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in Case Crime No.2 of 2024, registered at Police Station Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar.

2. As per the First Information Report dated 02.01.2024, on 31.12.2023, the applicants along with co-accused abused and assaulted the informant and other family members and the applicant no.2 fired on the informant.

3. Heard Mr. Mani Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned A.G.A.

for the State.

4. Mr. Mani Kumar, Advocate has contended that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present matter. There is only one contusion on the informant-Balraj Singh. He has further submitted that the applicants were granted interim bail vide order dated 0

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top