HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Irshad ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:-

Mr. Lalit Miglani, Advocate for the applicant.

Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder for the State.

Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Pavan Kumar Nath, Advocate for the informant.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Applicant is in judicial custody in Case Crime No.422 of 2021, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 504, 506 and 120-B IPC, Police Station Kotwali Laksar, District Haridwar. He seeks short term bail on the ground of his illness.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. This Court had required State to file response to the short term bail application. It has been filed.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant is a heart patient; the applicant has been suffering with multiple ailments; the applicant is a senior citizen; the doctor has advised him PTCA with stent; the applicant wants to get stent inserted. For that purpose, three weeks short term bail may be granted.

5. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the informant would submit that earlier, when the applicant was released on short term