SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1016534

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAM SINGH BHANDARI – Appellant
Versus
UTTARAKHAND TOURISM BOARD – Respondent
WPMB 72 / 2024



Office Notes, reports, orders or COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS proceedings SL.

Date or directions No and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPMB No. 72 of 2024 HON’BLE G. NARENDAR, C.J.

HON’BLE ALOK MAHRA, J Mr. Sagar Kothari, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. None is present for the respondents.

3. Petitioner has filed this writ petition for quashing the order dated 02.03.2024, whereby, respondent no. 2 have issued the tender for allotment of shops and dormitory in the parking area made by respondent no. 1.

4. The case of the petitioner is that since he was already conducting the parking and dormitory as per the M.O.U. dated 16.05.2022, which was for a period of three years and without cancelling that M.O.U., tender dated 02.03.2024 was floated.

5. This Court vide order dated 23.04.2024 directed the respondents to maintain status quo with regard to petitioner’s tender.

6. Now, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the period of three years of M.O.U. is almost over and he does not want to press the writ petition, therefore, the same may be permitted to be 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as (ALOK MAHRA, J.) (G. NARENDAR, C.J.

07.03.2025

Ujjwal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top