SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1016605

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHAZIEA SIDDIQUI ALIAS SHAJIYA SIDDQE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
CRLR 207 / 2025



Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL. Dat No. e an o d r d R i e re g c is t t io ra n r s ’ s COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS order with Signatures CRLR No. 207 of 2025 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. Mukesh Rawat, learned counsel for the Revisionist.

2. Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Instant Criminal Revision has been filed by the Revisionist seeking the release of her vehicle and for quashing and setting aside the order dated 12.02.2025, passed by the learned Special Judge (NDPS Act)/First Additional District and Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar in Misc. Criminal Case No. 480 of 2024, State vs. Shajiya Siddiqui, arising out of offences punishable under Sections 8/21/60 of the NDPS Act, Police Station Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. By the impugned order, the learned Special Judge (NDPS) has rejected the application filed by the Revisionist for release of her vehicle- Scooty bearing Registration No. UK 18 T 0883, Chassis No.

MD626AK36R3K05153, Engine No. AK3KR3202607.

4. In the present case, the FIR was registered on the basis of routine checking conducted by the police on 18.11.2024 within the jurisdiction of Police Station Kashipur. During vehicle checking, the police party allegedly intercepted a scooter, and upon search, allegedly recovered certain items which, according to them, were of suspicious or illegal nature.

5. Learned counsel for the Revisionist submits that the Revisionist had no knowledge of the alleged offence. It is contended that she has not committed any crime and that the vehicle was being used by her husband without her knowledge. There is no independent witness to the incident, which creates doubt over the prosecution story. It is further submitted that the

6. Learned State Counsel fairly concedes that the said vehicle 7. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the instant Criminal Revision stands disposed of. The vehicle in question is directed to be released in favour of the Revisionist upon her furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/-, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. The release shall be subject to the condition that the vehicle shall not be transferred, mortgaged, sold, or altered in its nature or condition in any manner whatsoever. The Revisionist shall also furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the court concerned or before any other authority as may be directed by the Court. (Ashish Naithani, J.)

19.11.2025 SS B H I h N IK J i O SkH LA sA h DU20sDe.bTiN a 5r g 5fti :64ae F Atc3l: a2N =R9 l 80I ub yN F=mK E s,3 5c io a g4,.9 A =1n pB NH r0e o=eDId sG Fft9 ,8b D5 H 6l y 8C7 CaS oe : O A H d94UI ,1 K Dc R 4= S n Tc2 H96O + A fS83bF H0 B 5 aU 4I I 'K N 31TcS3 J ,d H O s85tA1 L =RA C BUb5 I KTaN2 H67JAbA O93RN LaD2K5 ,c H4 oAu4bN= 75HDFaI,G 0H A8 CbO0B9E UcD R10 T2 fO E F 6178B25fb8d34D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top