HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SANJEEV KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
05th MAY, 2025 FI RST BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 2441 OF 2024 Sanjeev Kumar ..…Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate and Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate.
Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder.
Counsel for the Informant : Mr. Pawan Kumar Nath, Advocate.
Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.
The present regular bail has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.76 of 2024, registered at Police Station Rajpur, District Dehradun.
2. The applicant – Sanjeev Kumar is in judicial custody under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
3. As per the First Information Report, the co- the property-in-question. They executed an agreement to sell in favour of the informant. They received the amount from the informant. The informant later came to know that the said property was mortgaged with the bank.
4. Heard Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder for the State and Mr. Pawan Kumar Nath, learned counsel for the informant.
5. Mr. Pariksh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.