SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1016662

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAM AGGARWAL ALIAS SANJAY GARG – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

05th MAY, 2025 FI RST BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 2519 OF 2024 Ram Aggarwal alias Sanjay Garg ..…Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate and Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder.

Counsel for the Informant : Mr. Pawan Kumar Nath, Advocate.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The present regular bail has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.76 of 2024, registered at Police Station Rajpur, District Dehradun.

2. The applicant – Ram Aggarwal alias Sanjay Garg is in judicial custody under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. As per the First Information Report, the co- the property-in-question. They executed an agreement to sell in favour of the informant. They received the amount from the informant. The informant later came to know that the said property was mortgaged with the bank.

4. Heard Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder for the State and Mr. Pawan Kumar Nath, learned counse

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top