SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1016774

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

05TH MAY, 2025 ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 162 of 2025 Raj Kumar and Another … Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others … Respondents Counsel for the Applicants : Mr. R.P. Singh, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondents : Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The present Application has been filed by the applicants seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.253 of 2020, registered at Police Station Gangnahar, Roorkee, District Haridwar under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468 and Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. As per the First Information Report dated 14.06.2020, pursuant to a letter dated 17.04.2028 of the Secretary, Home, Uttarakhand Government, a Special Investigation Team was constituted in the scholarship scam matter. Sub-Inspector Bhanu Pratap Singh was appointed as a member of the said investigation team. He inquired the matter. He found that a sum of Rs.24,83,550/- was released by the Social Welfare Department. Sub-Inspector Bhanu Pratap Singh found that some concerned persons never took admission in the institute. After inquiry, he lodged the First I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top