SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1016815

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
PAWAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Reserved I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA WRI T PETI TI ON ( M/ B) NO.127 OF 2025 Pawan Kumar …..Petitioner.

Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ….Respondents.

With WRI T PETI TI ON ( M/ B) NO.131 OF 2025 Siddhant Bailwal …..Petitioner.

Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ….Respondents.

WRI T PETI TI ON ( M/ B) NO. 132 OF 2025 Tejendra Singh …..Petitioner.

Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ….Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr. Shobhit Saharia and Mr. Tej Pratap Singh, learned counsel.

Counsel for the Respondents : Mr. S.N. Babulkar, learned Advocate General with Mr. J.S.

Bisht, learned Standing Counsel.

Judgment Reserved on:17.06.2025 Judgment Delivered on:03.07.2025 The Court made the following:

COMMON JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Mr. G. Narendar)

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Advocate General for the State- respondents.

2. The instant writ petitions are preferred praying to declare a part of Rule 17b of the Uttarakhand Excise Policy Manual- Year 2025-26, 2026-27 and 2027-28 (Three Year Excise Policy), which prohibits sale of liquor by FL-5DS/M licen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top