SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1016816

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
M/S VRINDAWAN ENTERPRISES OFFICE AT HARIOM NAGAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL Writ Petition Misc. Bench No. 139 of 2025

23 April, 2025 M/s Vrindawan Enterprises …Petitioner Versus Union of India & Others …Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Maneesh Bisht, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Lalit Sharma, Central Govt. Standing Counsel, for the respondents.

--------------------------------------------------------------

J U D G M E N T Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

( Per: Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:

“i) To, issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of certiorari calling for the records and quash the impugned orders dated 06.06.2024, passed by respondent no. 5 i.e. Manager/CS, Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC), order dated 26.11.2024, passed by the Chief Regional Manager, IRCTC/RO-LKO, and the order dated 27.03.2025, passed by the Dy. General Manager/CS, IRCTC/RO-LKO. (Annexure No. 14, 17 & 19 to the writ petition)

ii) To, issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities to per

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top