HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHEKHAR PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPSB 108 / 2020
Office Notes, reports, orders SL. or proceedings Date No or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSB 108/ 2020 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate, i/b Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Dinesh Bankoti, Brief Holder, for the State.
Mr. Rakshit Srivastava, Advocate, i/b Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the respondent no. 7.
Mr. Devansh Kaushik, Advocate, i/b Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the respondent no. 8.
(2) By means of this writ petition, petitioner has challenged an advertisement issued on 6.5.2020. By the said advertisement, applications were invited for appointment to different faculty positions in different Govt. Medical Colleges in State of Uttarakhand. (3) Since the writ petition was filed in 2020 challenging an advertisement and the selection process must have been concluded by now, therefore, no useful purpose would served by keeping the writ petition pending.
petitioner submits that petitioner had applied for appointment as Professor and no selection could be held for which petitioner had applied.
(5) In view of the statement made writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Ashish Naithani, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
29.4.2025
Pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.