HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SABBAL SINGH CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH SINGH – Respondent
CLR 90 / 2024
Office Notes, reports, orders or SL. proceedings or Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures
23.04.2025 CLR No.90 of 2024 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.
The proposed civil revision has been filed under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 against the judgment and decree dated 12.08.2024, passed by the learned District Judge, Tehri Garhwal in SCC Suit No.02 of 2021, whereby the learned Judge has decreed the suit of the respondent-plaintiff for recovery of possession and mesne profits.
2. Heard Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, learned counsel for the revisionist.
3. On 22.04.2025, no one was present on behalf of the respondent. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent.
4. Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate submitted that there are sufficient materials available on the record to prove that the revisionist was not the tenant of the respondent.
5. Admit.
6. The eviction of the revisionist is kept in abeyance, subject to prior
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.