SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1016993

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AAMIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

23rd APRI L, 2025 ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO.403 OF 2025 Aamir and Another ..... Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicants : Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent :Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Brief Holder.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The present Application has been filed by the applicants seeking anticipatory bail under Section 3, Section 5 read with Section 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 and Section 132 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in Case Crime No.143 of 2025, registered at Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar.

2. As per the First Information Report dated 17.04.2025, the police party raided the spot on a secret information. The police party recovered 110 kilograms beef and other articles. The co-accused Shanawaz was arrested by the police. He told the police that those who fled from the spot were Aamir and Faisal.

3. Heard Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General for the State.

4. Mr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top