SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1017051

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
HARISH CHANDRA PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY – Respondent
WPSS 945 / 2016



Office Notes, reports, orders or SL. proceedings or Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures

24.04.2025 WPSS No.945 of 2016 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.

Mr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Jayvardhan Kandpal, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 4, Mr. Mukesh Kaparuwan, learned counsel for the respondent no.5, Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent nos.6 to 11, 13, 15 & 16 and Mr. Veer Kunwar (through video conferencing), learned counsel for the respondent no.12.

2. No one is present on behalf of the respondent no.14.

3. Objection to the Intervention Application (IA No.4527 of 2025), filed by Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, Advocate, is taken on record.

4. Remaining respondents have sought further ten days’ time, as a last opportunity to file objection to the

2025).

5. In the interest of justice, time is granted, as prayed.

6. Mr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, Advocate has also sought ten days’ time to file rejoinder affidavit to the counter affidavit, filed by Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, Advocate.

7. List on 05.05.2025 for hearing on of 2025)/on merits of the case.

(Alok Kumar Verma, J.)

24.04.2025

JKJ/Pant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top