SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1017107

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHOAIB AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

04th JUNE, 2025 ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 1326 OF 2024 Shoaib Ahmad and Others ..... Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder.

Counsel for the Informant : Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The present Application has been filed by the applicants seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 560 of 2024, registered at Police Station Gangnahar, District Haridwar under Sections 308(5), 318(4), 333, 336(3), 338, 340(2), 351(3), 352 and Section 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. As per the First Information Report, the applicants enticed the son of the informant to invest in their online trading with the assurance of higher returns, but the returns were not given.

3. Heard Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder for the respondent and Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the informant.

4. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, contended that it is a case of business transaction. The son of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top