HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
PAWAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Reserved I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA WRI T PETI TI ON ( M/ B) NO.127 OF 2025 Pawan Kumar …..Petitioner.
Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ….Respondents.
With WRI T PETI TI ON ( M/ B) NO.131 OF 2025 Siddhant Bailwal …..Petitioner.
Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ….Respondents.
WRI T PETI TI ON ( M/ B) NO. 132 OF 2025 Tejendra Singh …..Petitioner.
Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ….Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr. Shobhit Saharia and Mr. Tej Pratap Singh, learned counsel.
Counsel for the Respondents : Mr. S.N. Babulkar, learned Advocate General with Mr. J.S.
Bisht, learned Standing Counsel.
Judgment Reserved on:17.06.2025 Judgment Delivered on:03.07.2025 The Court made the following:
COMMON JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Mr. G. Narendar)
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Advocate General for the State- respondents.
2. The instant writ petitions are preferred praying to declare a part of Rule 17b of the Uttarakhand Excise Policy Manual- Year 2025-26, 2026-27 and 2027-28 (Three Year Excise Policy), which prohibits sale of liquor by FL-5DS/M licen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.