HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KHILPATI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NARAYAN DUTT – Respondent
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.
Date or directions and COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No Registrar’s order with Signatures SA No. 10 of 2009 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel for the appellants.
2. Mr. Ravi Bisht, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Ravi Babulkar, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. This is an admitted appeal, admitted on 17.04.2009 and while admitting the appeal this court already stayed the execution proceeding until further order.
4. Learned counsel for the appellants Mr. Aditya Singh submits that the Trial Court misinterpreting the order dated 17.04.2009 in view of the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P.Ltd. and Another vs. CBI (2018) 16 SCC 299 by observing that the stay order will only operate six months and now the execution proceeding is going on.
5. Learned counsel for the appellants Mr. Aditya Singh submits that it is completely a wrong interpretation of the Executing Court since it is an admitted appeal and furthermore the aforesaid judgment firstly is not applicable and subsequently the aforesaid judgment is now reviewed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.