SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1017261

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MADHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 242 of 2024

07 July, 2025 Madhu --Revisionist Versus State Of Uttarakhand & another --Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Nadeem Azad, learned counsel for the revisionist.

Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA for the State.

Mr. Yash Bisht, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, learned counsel for respondent no.2.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

This is a revision preferred under Section

397/401 Cr.P.C. r/w Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 23.02.2024 passed by Judge, Family Court, Dehradun in Original suit No.496 of 2021, Smt. Madhu vs. Mohit Kumar whereby an interim maintenance of Rs.2,000/- has been granted to revisionist.

2. Facts in nutshell are that an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was moved by revisionist-wife herein before trial court on 15.11.2021, whereupon notices were issued to the respondent-husband, but even after sufficient service, he did not present in the court, due to which, by order dated 30.06.2022 orders for ex-parte proceedings were passed. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top