HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MADHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 242 of 2024
07 July, 2025 Madhu --Revisionist Versus State Of Uttarakhand & another --Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. Nadeem Azad, learned counsel for the revisionist.
Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA for the State.
Mr. Yash Bisht, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, learned counsel for respondent no.2.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
This is a revision preferred under Section
397/401 Cr.P.C. r/w Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 23.02.2024 passed by Judge, Family Court, Dehradun in Original suit No.496 of 2021, Smt. Madhu vs. Mohit Kumar whereby an interim maintenance of Rs.2,000/- has been granted to revisionist.
2. Facts in nutshell are that an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was moved by revisionist-wife herein before trial court on 15.11.2021, whereupon notices were issued to the respondent-husband, but even after sufficient service, he did not present in the court, due to which, by order dated 30.06.2022 orders for ex-parte proceedings were passed. Th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.