SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1017353

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAMDAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OT UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS No.

and Registrar’s order with Signatures BA1/ 539/ 2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Mr. Mayank Joshi, learned counsel for the applicant though Legal Aid.

2. Mr. Siddharth Bisht, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3. Present applicant Ramdas, S/o Gowardhan is praying for regular bail in relation to FIR dated 13.05.2019 registered as FIR/Case Crime No. 89 of 2019 at P.S. Gadarpur District Udham Singh Nagar wherein the present applicant has been implicated for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is languishing in jail since 14.05.2019 and the charge sheet has been filed on 05.08.2019 and thereafter trial has been commenced and there are in total 27 witnesses, however, up till date only six witnesses have been examined. He submits that there is apparently delay in trial of no fault of the applicant.

5. On the other side, learned State Counsel have not disputed this fact that the present applicant is languishing in jail since 14.05.2019 and up till date only six witnesses h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top