SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1017401

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAVI DUTT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Second Bail Application No. 32 of 2025 Ravi Dutt ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:-

Mr. Pranav Singh, Advocate for the applicant.

Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder for the State.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No. 0661 of

2023, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 325, 307 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused.

3. This is the second bail application. The first bail application, being BA1 No.324 of 2024, was rejected on

01.07.2024.

4. According to the FIR, on 16.10.2023, at 2:30 PM, the applicant alongwith the co-accused attacked the informant, his daughter and his brother-in-law. They were armed with iron rod and sariya, etc., due to which, the informant and other family members sustained serious injuries.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that during investigation, specific role of hitting on the head was assigned to the applicant; there was only one injury, but during trial, the victim has been examined as PW2. He has assigned role to the applicant and the co-a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top