SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1017413

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MAHIPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

17th JUNE, 2025 ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 544 OF 2025 Mahipal Singh ..... Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate.

Ms. Neeti Rana, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, A.G.A.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The present Application has been filed by the applicant - Mahipal Singh for anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.07 of 2020 (Special Sessions Trial No.3 of 2024), registered at Vigilance Establishment Sector at Dehradun, District Dehradun under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

2. Heard Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned A.G.A.

for the respondent.

3. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate, submitted that the applicant, aged about 57 years, has been falsely implicated in the present matter. He has not received any money from the complainant. In the Writ Petition (Criminal) No.1351 of 2020, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to quash the First Information Report, he was granted interim relief. He was not arrested during the cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top