SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1017471

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
PRAMOD CHANDRA PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders SL. or proceedings Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS 1091/ 2025 WPSS 298/ 2024 WPSS 299/ 2024 WPSS 314/ 2024 WPSS 829/ 2024 WPSS 544/ 2024 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate, for the petitioners in WPSS/1091/2025.

Mr. Nikhil Bhatt, Advocate, for the petitioners in WPSS/298/2024 and WPSS/299/2024.

Mr. Siddhartha Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner in WPSS/829/2024.

Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate, for the petitioners in WPSS/544/2025.

Mr. Narayan Dutt, Standing Counsel, and Mr. N.K. Papnai, Standing Counsel, for the State.

(2) After arguing for a while, learned Counsels for the petitioners submitted that since identical issue is pending consideration before Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal in Claim Petition No. 88/DB/2024 (Harsh D. Joshi v. State of Uttarakhand), therefore, these writ petitions along with entire record may also be relegated to the Tribunal.

(3) Learned State Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned Counsel for the petitioners.

(4) In such view of the matter, these writ petitions along with entire records are transferred to Uttarakhand Public Services T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top