HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MANISH KUMAR ARYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPSS 633 / 2022
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL. No. Date or directions and COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSS/ 684/ 2022 With WPSS/ 633/ 2022 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Ms. Prabha Naithani, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Standing Counsel for the State.
Mr. Rajendra Arya, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for the UPNL.
1. Since common questions of facts and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, these are being heard and decided together. However, for the sake of brevity and convenience, facts of Writ Petition (SS) No. 684 of 2022, alone are being considered and discussed.
2. Petitioners were engaged on contract through a private outsourcing agency in Department of Training and Employment for serving as Instructor in Government Industrial Training Institute on different dates. Their engagement, however, was discontinued in the year 2019, allegedly by an oral order.
3. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, termination of services of the petitioner was challenged in a writ petition, which was dismissed and in Special Appeal filed by petitioner, Division Bench permitted the petitioners to make representation to the competent authority. The representation made pursuant to that order has been rejected by the impugned order dated 21.03.2022, which is under challenge in this writ petition.
4. Petitioners had requested for their re-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.